Comments on: Canada 2010 Federal Budget Highlights

By: Daniel Go

Daniel Go — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:41:21 +0000

This article provides us a very great inspiration on dealing with the debt aspect of every nation’s economy. I’m sure it’s greatly affecting because you’re paying for something you are actually not able to utilize at all. In the long run, I agree with Mr. Anthony Parker, with further tax increase, hopefully this problem could be solved.

Best regards,
Daniel
Shisha guy
website: Hookahset.com

By: Daniel Go

Daniel Go — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:03:00 +0000

Same here @Anthony Parker, I wish our country could find a way to get out the way spending a lot just to pay debt services. It’s really a big waste.

By: Anthony Parker

Anthony Parker — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:59:13 +0000

It is amazing to me to see Canada being so proactive and actually doing something to cut the federal budget to get out of debt. I only wish here in a America we could put the same type of approach in place, especially without any further tax increases.

Anthony Parker
Aurora, CO
My Blog: cherokee scrubs

By: Raif

Raif — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:32:07 +0000

With the continuing tranfer of tax collection to the consumer portfolio the collateral affect of increasing taxes is processed without notice. Increased cost in the food, materials,and services sectors passes a windfall to governments with the HST taxation plan alone. It is great to see some attention paid to seniors but more money isn’t really the problem. The problem is is that most supplemental programs such as GIS and SA have a qualifying benchmarks so low that most seniors can’t clear that obstacle. Seniors to Mr. Harper, raise the threshold from %32,000 per year per couple to at least the poverty wage threshold of $28,000 per year per person, that is $56,000 per year per couple.